

Manufacturer pricing rules prevent us from advertising our discount — no account or email required to see it.
Secure Payments
Easy Returns
Expert Advice
Fast Shipping
The ANSELL 245325 is a cut-resistant, puncture-resistant work glove built for food-processing and industrial environments where hand protection against sharp edges and rough surfaces is a daily requirement. Constructed from Dyneema fiber throughout the shell, lining, and back, the glove meets ANSI Cut Level A6 and achieves an EN388 rating of 4X2XF, placing it among higher-tier cut protection categories. The Tuff Cuff elastic slip-on cuff measures 3 inches in length and provides a secure, adjustable fit at the wrist. The uncoated, full-fingered design delivers tactile sensitivity alongside an inherently rough grip surface. Worn as a pair, these gloves are sized at Medium for men and Large for women in unisex build.
This glove is rated for use in beef, pork, poultry, seafood, vegetable, and fruit processing lines where cut hazards from blades, bones, and sharp tooling are present. The uncoated Dyneema construction keeps the glove lint-free concerns minimal and maintains dexterity for repetitive hand motions. Industrial maintenance, fabrication, and assembly technicians working with sheet metal or sharp components will also find the A6 cut rating relevant. The glove is not FDA approved, does not provide a blood-borne pathogen barrier, and is not static dissipative. It is not high-visibility. It falls under the ANSELL Series 74-048.
Designed as an OEM-style replacement or direct-issue cut-resistant glove for food-processing operations and industrial hand-protection programs requiring ANSI Cut Level A6 performance in a full-fingered, uncoated format.
Gloves are donned and removed by hand without tools. Inspect each glove prior to use for cuts, tears, or compromised seams that would reduce protection. Follow facility safety protocols and applicable OSHA hand-protection standards when selecting gloves for specific cut-hazard tasks. Do not use these gloves as a substitute for blood-borne pathogen or chemical barrier protection, as they are not rated for those hazards.
Thanks for subscribing!
This email has been registered!